My research in this area focuses on the economic insights of Plato, with one project developing a thread through Aristotle as well (draft available upon request).
-
"The Psychology of Money in Plato's Republic." History of Political Economy 58 (2026), pp. 211–234. Abstract
Plato is often characterized as being generally disdainful of money and as believing that pursuit and possession of money is morally corrupting. I offer a modification of this view: Plato does not think that money is dangerous in general, but that it is dangerous for individuals with great natures in particular. The vast majority of people, whom Plato would classify as producers in his ideal city, are psychologically insusceptible to the dangerous influence of money. Understanding this aspect of his moral psychology encourages more careful consideration of the role of money and, much more generally, economic activities in Kallipolis. This paper (1) offers an argument regarding Plato's moral psychology and (2) explores the function of money in his ideal constitution.
-
"Plato's Market Optimism." Polis 39 (2022), pp. 456–465. Abstract
Despite the extensiveness of top-down control in his ideal city, Plato takes seriously the idea that the market does not require total regulation via legislation and that participants in the market may be capable of self-regulation. This paper examines the discussion of market regulation in the Republic and argues that the philosopher rulers play a very limited role in regulating market activities. Indeed, they are concerned only with averting excesses of wealth and poverty. The rules and regulations that are foundational to the daily functioning of the market — enforcement of contracts, resolution of disputes, etc. — are endogenous to the market participants themselves. In allowing for this self-regulation, Plato expresses tempered optimism about the market and a profound confidence in his ideal city's educational program.
-
"On Why the City of Pigs and Clocks are Not Just." Journal of the History of Philosophy 57 (2019), pp. 574–594. Abstract
This paper isn't strictly about political economy, but it shows my early thinking about the principle of specialization. Some Plato scholars have recently argued that the "City of Pigs" — described in Book II of the Republic, before Socrates goes on to describe Kallipolis and the definition of justice — is better and more just than Kallipolis itself. I argue that this interpretation misconstrues Plato's conception of justice by ignoring three significant conditions that he establishes for making an entity eligible for being just. In overlooking these conditions, scholars have misconceived the definition of justice itself, resulting in an overestimation of the virtue of the City of Pigs.